![]() I must acknowledge that some of them present strong reasoning and not merely faith-based arguments. I would rather call them arguments for claiming that Mahabharata is a true account of history. We have tried to answer some of the questions by first analyzing what are the available pieces of evidence that suggest Mahabharata is real. It always further raises the question that if Mahabharata is not real then who wrote Geeta and what was the purpose? You May Also Like: interesting facts about Mahabharata that you may not know about Bhagvat Geeta and its Significance in Mahabharata Artist’s depiction of Krishna narrating Bhagvat Geeta to Arjunīhagvat Geeta which is one of the most well-known and important holy books in Hinduism is a part of Mahabharata.īhagvat Geeta is said to be a documented narrative of the god Krishna to Arjuna to fulfill his moral obligation and fight in the war of Kurukshetra. To answer this question, it is necessary to examine the arguments and evidence presented by both proponents of history and proponents of mythology.Ĭlearly, the Mahabharata has a pervasive presence in Indian culture, suggesting that at least some aspects of the epic must be true in order to have such a profound impact on the shared memory of diverse societies. This raises the question of whether the Mahabharata is a myth or a historical reality. Mythology is typically associated with a single culture or a small group of cultures, but the Mahabharata is revered by many. Some may wonder how the shared memory of so many diverse cultures could be just a myth. However, it is important to consider both sides of the argument and evaluate all available evidence using a modern, evidence-based approach. The study of Indian history based on available archaeological and scientific evidence has reached a clear conclusion. Hoysaleswara Temple 12th century depiction of the Mahabharata battle However, they are unable to explain the enduring impact of the epic on modern Hindu society. On the other hand, skeptics and members of the scientific community often reject the idea that the Mahabharata is a historical record and classify it as mythology. However, these claims often lack historical evidence and may be biased. Some proponents argue that it is a true account of history and point to published resources and alleged evidence of its historicity. There is an ongoing debate about whether the Mahabharata should be considered a historical record or a work of fiction. Many believe that the Mahabharata is a true historical account, while others see it as a myth. The Mahabharata is a revered Hindu epic with a deep association with Hinduism and a significant influence on modern Hindu cultural traditions. You are reading the most detailed analysis of the historicity of Mahabharata where we analyze the evidence for Mahabharata as a historical, rather than a mythical narrative. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |